System of evaluation of students during the university

System of evaluation of students during the university

In many advanced schooling organizations throughout the world, they use a four-point system for evaluating students’ knowledge, abilities and abilities: “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”.

Comprehending the meaning of points

The assessment “excellent” deserves a student who may have discovered comprehensive, systematic and deep knowledge, the capacity to independently perform the tasks provided by this program, knowledgeable about the main and extra literary works, suggested by this system. Such an evaluation also involves the mastering associated with relationship between your basic ideas of control and their significance when it comes to obtained occupation.

The evaluation “good” sets the student who has got mastered the educational and program product in complete, successfully fulfills this program’s tasks, worked out of the literature that is main by this system. That is, a student who’s shown the systematic nature of control knowledge and it is with the capacity of self-replenishment and upgrading along the way of further educational work and activity that is professional.

The grades “satisfactory” deserve students who’s got found the information associated with fundamental educational material to the level needed for further training and future operate in a profession, with the capacity of doing the tasks given to by the program, knowledgeable about the key literary works recommended by this program. As being a guideline, this assessment is presented to pupils who possess made flaws into the response to the exam as well as in the performance associated with the exam projects, but have demonstrated the capability to eradicate them.

The evaluation is “unsatisfactory” for the pupil who has got knowledge of gaps which includes resulted in fundamental mistakes into the utilization of the tasks given to because of the system, that is, students that is not able to continue education or start expert activities after graduation without extra trained in the profile essay appropriate control.

Shortcomings of four-point evaluation rating and system system

A four-way system for evaluating pupils’ knowledge, abilities and abilities requires significant improvement or replacement. Its main disadvantages are: insufficient motivation for the perseverance of educational and intellectual activity, since it centers on obtaining a minimum of knowledge (“made up” – “did perhaps not make up”); made for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly “weathered”); subjectivity into the assessment of student’s knowledge; inconsistency utilizing the school system, which pupils used as former pupils, etc.

The rating system of evaluation, which is based on the accumulation of grades for a certain period of study (module, semester, year, whole term of training) for a comprehensive educational and cognitive activity, is becoming increasingly popular along with the four-point traditional system of evaluation of students’ knowledge. The sum of the these assessments functions as an indicator that is quantitative of quality of academic and cognitive activity associated with student in comparison to the successes of his fellow students.

The score system for evaluating students’ knowledge, skills and abilities is dependent on the principles that are following

  • each educational control and the pupil’s work with its mastering is evaluated within the credit units, the total amount of which will be decided by the rating;
  • the record of this pupil’s present work must certanly be kept, that will be reflected in the evaluation that is finalin the devices of credits);
  • the peculiarities of teaching different topics (complexity, need for discipline into the curriculum) are taken into consideration, that is, the complexity element (significance);
  • accessibility to different sorts of control (outgoing, current, intermediate, final);

The student score for a semester or year is defined as the normal arithmetic associated with score for every single discipline.

To implement a rating system for assessing pupils’ knowledge, certain conditions are very important: the readiness of instructors and pupils to perceive them; appropriate organizational and methodological help, in specific, independent work of pupils is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting in the shape of unique tables; application of written verification of knowledge, etc.